Central African Republic vs Namibia: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Central African Republic
47.06
in 2019
Namibia
47.06
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
163rd
Namibia rank
163rd
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Namibia
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 47.06 against 47.06 in Namibia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Namibia ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 163rd and Namibia ranks 163rd of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.86 | 47.06 | 4.2 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 48.82 | 47.06 | 1.76 | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Central African Republic or Namibia?
- Central African Republic, at 47.06 against 47.06 in Namibia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Central African Republic and Namibia?
- 0, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Namibia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Namibia rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Central African Republic ranks 163rd and Namibia ranks 163rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.