Chile vs North Macedonia: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Chile
70.59
in 2019
North Macedonia
70.59
in 2019
Chile rank
76th
North Macedonia rank
76th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Chile
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 70.59 against 70.59 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 76th and North Macedonia ranks 76th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.94 | 32.77 | 20.17 | Chile |
| 2010s | 60 | 71.18 | 11.18 | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Chile or North Macedonia?
- Chile, at 70.59 against 70.59 in North Macedonia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Chile and North Macedonia?
- 0, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and North Macedonia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Chile and North Macedonia rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Chile ranks 76th and North Macedonia ranks 76th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.