Chile vs Sao Tome and Principe: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Chile
70.59
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
70.59
in 2019
Chile rank
77th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
77th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Chile
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Chile currently reports 70.59 against 70.59 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 77th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 77th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.94 | 41.18 | 11.76 | Chile |
| 2010s | 60 | 65.29 | 5.29 | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Chile or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Chile, at 70.59 against 70.59 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Chile and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Chile ranks 77th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 77th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.