China vs Marshall Islands: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
China
79.12
in 2019
Marshall Islands
76.47
in 2019
China rank
50th
Marshall Islands rank
51st
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- China
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
China currently reports 79.12 against 76.47 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 2.65.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
China ranks 50th and Marshall Islands ranks 51st of 190 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.73 | 74.79 | 47.06 | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 44.97 | 76.47 | 31.5 | Marshall Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, China or Marshall Islands?
- China, at 79.12 against 76.47 in Marshall Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between China and Marshall Islands?
- 2.65, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Marshall Islands?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do China and Marshall Islands rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- China ranks 50th and Marshall Islands ranks 51st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.