China (People’s Republic of) vs Poland: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
China (People’s Republic of)
79.12
in 2019
Poland
76.47
in 2019
China (People’s Republic of) rank
50th
Poland rank
51st
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- China (People’s Republic of)
- Poland
How they compare
China (People’s Republic of) currently reports 79.12 against 76.47 in Poland, a difference of 2.65.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Poland ahead.
China (People’s Republic of) ranks 50th and Poland ranks 51st of 190 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China (People’s Republic of) | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.73 | 44.54 | 16.81 | Poland |
| 2010s | 44.97 | 72.94 | 27.97 | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, China (People’s Republic of) or Poland?
- China (People’s Republic of), at 79.12 against 76.47 in Poland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between China (People’s Republic of) and Poland?
- 2.65, with China (People’s Republic of) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China (People’s Republic of) and Poland?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do China (People’s Republic of) and Poland rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- China (People’s Republic of) ranks 50th and Poland ranks 51st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.