Comoros vs Germany: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score

Comoros
52.94
in 2019
Germany
52.94
in 2019
Comoros rank
146th
Germany rank
146th

Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time

  • Comoros
  • Germany
0204060200320112019

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 52.94 against 52.94 in Germany, a difference of 0.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Germany has been ahead every year.

Comoros ranks 146th and Germany ranks 146th of 188 countries.

Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Germany Difference Ahead
2000s 47.06 52.94 5.88 Germany
2010s 51.76 52.94 1.18 Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Comoros or Germany?
Comoros, at 52.94 against 52.94 in Germany as of 2019.
What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Comoros and Germany?
0, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Germany?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Comoros and Germany rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
Comoros ranks 146th and Germany ranks 146th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.