Côte d'Ivoire vs Lithuania: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Côte d'Ivoire
82.35
in 2019
Lithuania
82.35
in 2019
Côte d'Ivoire rank
29th
Lithuania rank
29th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Lithuania
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 82.35 against 82.35 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 29th and Lithuania ranks 29th of 191 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.7 | 62.18 | 18.49 | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 68.24 | 76.47 | 8.24 | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Côte d'Ivoire or Lithuania?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 82.35 against 82.35 in Lithuania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Côte d'Ivoire and Lithuania?
- 0, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Lithuania?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Lithuania rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 29th and Lithuania ranks 29th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.