Côte d'Ivoire vs Senegal: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Côte d'Ivoire
82.35
in 2019
Senegal
82.35
in 2019
Côte d'Ivoire rank
29th
Senegal rank
29th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Senegal
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 82.35 against 82.35 in Senegal, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Senegal ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 29th and Senegal ranks 29th of 191 countries.
Senegal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.7 | 51.26 | 7.56 | Senegal |
| 2010s | 68.24 | 81.76 | 13.53 | Senegal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Côte d'Ivoire or Senegal?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 82.35 against 82.35 in Senegal as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Côte d'Ivoire and Senegal?
- 0, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Senegal?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Senegal rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 29th and Senegal ranks 29th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.