Equatorial Guinea vs Venezuela: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Equatorial Guinea
11.76
in 2019
Venezuela
0
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
190th
Venezuela rank
191st
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Venezuela
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 11.76 against 0 in Venezuela, a difference of 11.76.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Venezuela ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 190th and Venezuela ranks 191st of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Venezuela in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Venezuela | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 3.53 | 3.53 | Venezuela |
| 2010s | 4.12 | 0 | 4.12 | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Venezuela?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 11.76 against 0 in Venezuela as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Venezuela?
- 11.76, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Venezuela?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Venezuela rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 190th and Venezuela ranks 191st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.