Eritrea vs Philippines: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score

Eritrea
29.41
in 2019
Philippines
29.41
in 2019
Eritrea rank
183rd
Philippines rank
183rd

Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time

  • Eritrea
  • Philippines
0102030200320112019

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 29.41 against 29.41 in Philippines, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Eritrea ahead.

Eritrea ranks 183rd and Philippines ranks 183rd of 188 countries.

Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Philippines Difference Ahead
2000s 29.41 4.9 24.51 Eritrea
2010s 29.41 9.41 20 Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Eritrea or Philippines?
Eritrea, at 29.41 against 29.41 in Philippines as of 2019.
What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Eritrea and Philippines?
0, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Philippines?
16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
How do Eritrea and Philippines rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
Eritrea ranks 183rd and Philippines ranks 183rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.