Eritrea, The State of vs Uganda: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Eritrea, The State of
29.41
in 2019
Uganda
29.41
in 2019
Eritrea, The State of rank
185th
Uganda rank
185th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Eritrea, The State of
- Uganda
How they compare
Eritrea, The State of currently reports 29.41 against 29.41 in Uganda, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Eritrea, The State of ahead.
Eritrea, The State of ranks 185th and Uganda ranks 185th of 190 countries.
Eritrea, The State of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea, The State of | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.41 | 5.88 | 23.53 | Eritrea, The State of |
| 2010s | 29.41 | 24.71 | 4.71 | Eritrea, The State of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Eritrea, The State of or Uganda?
- Eritrea, The State of, at 29.41 against 29.41 in Uganda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Eritrea, The State of and Uganda?
- 0, with Eritrea, The State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea, The State of and Uganda?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Eritrea, The State of and Uganda rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Eritrea, The State of ranks 185th and Uganda ranks 185th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.