Georgia vs United Arab Emirates: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Georgia
100
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
94.12
in 2019
Georgia rank
1st
United Arab Emirates rank
3rd
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Georgia
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 100 against 94.12 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 5.88.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times United Arab Emirates's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 1st and United Arab Emirates ranks 3rd of 191 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.91 | 50.42 | 18.49 | Georgia |
| 2010s | 94.71 | 75.88 | 18.82 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Georgia or United Arab Emirates?
- Georgia, at 100 against 94.12 in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Georgia and United Arab Emirates?
- 5.88, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and United Arab Emirates?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Georgia and United Arab Emirates rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Georgia ranks 1st and United Arab Emirates ranks 3rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.