Grenada vs Lesotho: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score

Grenada
70.59
in 2019
Lesotho
70.59
in 2019
Grenada rank
75th
Lesotho rank
75th

Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time

  • Grenada
  • Lesotho
020406080200320112019

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 70.59 against 70.59 in Lesotho, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Grenada ahead.

Grenada ranks 75th and Lesotho ranks 75th of 188 countries.

Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Lesotho Difference Ahead
2000s 70.59 60 10.59 Grenada
2010s 70.59 65.29 5.29 Grenada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Grenada or Lesotho?
Grenada, at 70.59 against 70.59 in Lesotho as of 2019.
What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Grenada and Lesotho?
0, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Lesotho?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Grenada and Lesotho rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
Grenada ranks 75th and Lesotho ranks 75th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.