Grenada vs North Macedonia: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Grenada
70.59
in 2019
North Macedonia
70.59
in 2019
Grenada rank
76th
North Macedonia rank
76th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Grenada
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 70.59 against 70.59 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 76th and North Macedonia ranks 76th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.59 | 38.82 | 31.76 | Grenada |
| 2010s | 70.59 | 71.18 | 0.5882 | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Grenada or North Macedonia?
- Grenada, at 70.59 against 70.59 in North Macedonia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Grenada and North Macedonia?
- 0, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and North Macedonia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Grenada and North Macedonia rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Grenada ranks 76th and North Macedonia ranks 76th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.