Grenada vs Yemen, Republic of: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Grenada
70.59
in 2019
Yemen, Republic of
70.59
in 2019
Grenada rank
76th
Yemen, Republic of rank
76th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Grenada
- Yemen, Republic of
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 70.59 against 70.59 in Yemen, Republic of, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 76th and Yemen, Republic of ranks 76th of 190 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Yemen, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.59 | 48.24 | 22.35 | Grenada |
| 2010s | 70.59 | 70.59 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Grenada or Yemen, Republic of?
- Grenada, at 70.59 against 70.59 in Yemen, Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Grenada and Yemen, Republic of?
- 0, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Yemen, Republic of?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Grenada and Yemen, Republic of rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Grenada ranks 76th and Yemen, Republic of ranks 76th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.