Guyana vs Vanuatu: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score

Guyana
64.71
in 2019
Vanuatu
64.71
in 2019
Guyana rank
96th
Vanuatu rank
96th

Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time

  • Guyana
  • Vanuatu
0204060200320112019

How they compare

Guyana currently reports 64.71 against 64.71 in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Vanuatu ahead.

Guyana ranks 96th and Vanuatu ranks 96th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 1 and Vanuatu in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guyana Vanuatu Difference Ahead
2000s 58.82 59.8 0.9804 Vanuatu
2010s 63.53 61.18 2.35 Guyana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Guyana or Vanuatu?
Guyana, at 64.71 against 64.71 in Vanuatu as of 2019.
What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Guyana and Vanuatu?
0, with Guyana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Vanuatu?
16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
How do Guyana and Vanuatu rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
Guyana ranks 96th and Vanuatu ranks 96th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.