Hungary vs Papua New Guinea: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Hungary
70.59
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
70.59
in 2019
Hungary rank
77th
Papua New Guinea rank
77th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Hungary
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 70.59 against 70.59 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Hungary ranks 77th and Papua New Guinea ranks 77th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.07 | 70.59 | 2.52 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 71.76 | 70.59 | 1.18 | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Hungary or Papua New Guinea?
- Hungary, at 70.59 against 70.59 in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Hungary and Papua New Guinea?
- 0, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Papua New Guinea?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Hungary and Papua New Guinea rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Hungary ranks 77th and Papua New Guinea ranks 77th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.