Israel vs Republic of Korea: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Israel
88.24
in 2019
Republic of Korea
88.24
in 2019
Israel rank
8th
Republic of Korea rank
8th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Israel
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Israel currently reports 88.24 against 88.24 in Republic of Korea, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 8th and Republic of Korea ranks 8th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 1 and Republic of Korea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.47 | 48.74 | 27.73 | Israel |
| 2010s | 79.41 | 81.18 | 1.76 | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Israel or Republic of Korea?
- Israel, at 88.24 against 88.24 in Republic of Korea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Israel and Republic of Korea?
- 0, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Republic of Korea?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Israel and Republic of Korea rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Israel ranks 8th and Republic of Korea ranks 8th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.