Jamaica vs United Arab Emirates: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Jamaica
94.12
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
94.12
in 2019
Jamaica rank
3rd
United Arab Emirates rank
3rd
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Jamaica
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 94.12 against 94.12 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 3rd and United Arab Emirates ranks 3rd of 191 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.91 | 50.42 | 18.49 | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 85.29 | 75.88 | 9.41 | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Jamaica or United Arab Emirates?
- Jamaica, at 94.12 against 94.12 in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Jamaica and United Arab Emirates?
- 0, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and United Arab Emirates?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Jamaica and United Arab Emirates rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Jamaica ranks 3rd and United Arab Emirates ranks 3rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.