Jordan vs Solomon Islands: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Jordan
64.71
in 2019
Solomon Islands
64.71
in 2019
Jordan rank
99th
Solomon Islands rank
99th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Jordan
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 64.71 against 64.71 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 99th and Solomon Islands ranks 99th of 191 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50.42 | 64.71 | 14.29 | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 64.71 | 64.71 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Jordan or Solomon Islands?
- Jordan, at 64.71 against 64.71 in Solomon Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Jordan and Solomon Islands?
- 0, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Solomon Islands?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Jordan and Solomon Islands rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Jordan ranks 99th and Solomon Islands ranks 99th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.