Kazakhstan vs Mauritania: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Kazakhstan
82.35
in 2019
Mauritania
82.35
in 2019
Kazakhstan rank
29th
Mauritania rank
29th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Kazakhstan
- Mauritania
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 82.35 against 82.35 in Mauritania, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Mauritania ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 29th and Mauritania ranks 29th of 191 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50.42 | 44.54 | 5.88 | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 70.59 | 65.29 | 5.29 | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Kazakhstan or Mauritania?
- Kazakhstan, at 82.35 against 82.35 in Mauritania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Kazakhstan and Mauritania?
- 0, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Mauritania?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Kazakhstan and Mauritania rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Kazakhstan ranks 29th and Mauritania ranks 29th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.