Kenya vs Syrian Arab Republic: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Kenya
64.71
in 2019
Syrian Arab Republic
64.71
in 2019
Kenya rank
99th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
99th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Kenya
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 64.71 against 64.71 in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 0.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Syrian Arab Republic has been ahead every year.
Kenya ranks 99th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 99th of 191 countries.
Syrian Arab Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.85 | 42.02 | 20.17 | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2010s | 41.18 | 64.71 | 23.53 | Syrian Arab Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Kenya or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Kenya, at 64.71 against 64.71 in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Kenya and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 0, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Kenya and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Kenya ranks 99th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 99th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.