Republic of Korea vs Togo: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Republic of Korea
88.24
in 2019
Togo
88.24
in 2019
Republic of Korea rank
8th
Togo rank
8th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Republic of Korea
- Togo
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 88.24 against 88.24 in Togo, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Republic of Korea ahead.
Republic of Korea ranks 8th and Togo ranks 8th of 190 countries.
Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Korea | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48.74 | 34.45 | 14.29 | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 81.18 | 72.94 | 8.24 | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Republic of Korea or Togo?
- Republic of Korea, at 88.24 against 88.24 in Togo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Republic of Korea and Togo?
- 0, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Togo?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Korea and Togo rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Republic of Korea ranks 8th and Togo ranks 8th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.