Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Taiwan, China: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
88.24
in 2019
Taiwan, China
88.24
in 2019
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
8th
Taiwan, China rank
8th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- Taiwan, China
How they compare
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) currently reports 88.24 against 88.24 in Taiwan, China, a difference of 0.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Taiwan, China has been ahead every year.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 8th and Taiwan, China ranks 8th of 191 countries.
Taiwan, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Taiwan, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.94 | 70.59 | 17.65 | Taiwan, China |
| 2010s | 74.71 | 86.47 | 11.76 | Taiwan, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) or Taiwan, China?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), at 88.24 against 88.24 in Taiwan, China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Taiwan, China?
- 0, with Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Taiwan, China?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Taiwan, China rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 8th and Taiwan, China ranks 8th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.