Kuwait vs Madagascar: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score

Kuwait
76.47
in 2019
Madagascar
76.47
in 2019
Kuwait rank
50th
Madagascar rank
50th

Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time

  • Kuwait
  • Madagascar
20406080200320112019

How they compare

Kuwait currently reports 76.47 against 76.47 in Madagascar, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Kuwait ahead.

Kuwait ranks 50th and Madagascar ranks 50th of 188 countries.

Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kuwait Madagascar Difference Ahead
2000s 29.41 40.34 10.92 Madagascar
2010s 43.53 60 16.47 Madagascar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Kuwait or Madagascar?
Kuwait, at 76.47 against 76.47 in Madagascar as of 2019.
What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Kuwait and Madagascar?
0, with Kuwait ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Madagascar?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Kuwait and Madagascar rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
Kuwait ranks 50th and Madagascar ranks 50th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.