Latvia, Republic of vs Morocco: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Latvia, Republic of
82.35
in 2019
Morocco
82.35
in 2019
Latvia, Republic of rank
28th
Morocco rank
28th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Latvia, Republic of
- Morocco
How they compare
Latvia, Republic of currently reports 82.35 against 82.35 in Morocco, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Latvia, Republic of ahead.
Latvia, Republic of ranks 28th and Morocco ranks 28th of 190 countries.
Latvia, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia, Republic of | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.47 | 60.5 | 15.97 | Latvia, Republic of |
| 2010s | 81.76 | 73.53 | 8.24 | Latvia, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Latvia, Republic of or Morocco?
- Latvia, Republic of, at 82.35 against 82.35 in Morocco as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Latvia, Republic of and Morocco?
- 0, with Latvia, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia, Republic of and Morocco?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Latvia, Republic of and Morocco rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Latvia, Republic of ranks 28th and Morocco ranks 28th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.