Lesotho, Kingdom of vs Maldives: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Lesotho, Kingdom of
70.59
in 2019
Maldives
70.59
in 2019
Lesotho, Kingdom of rank
76th
Maldives rank
76th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Lesotho, Kingdom of
- Maldives
How they compare
Lesotho, Kingdom of currently reports 70.59 against 70.59 in Maldives, a difference of 0.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Maldives has been ahead every year.
Lesotho, Kingdom of ranks 76th and Maldives ranks 76th of 190 countries.
Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho, Kingdom of | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.98 | 75.63 | 17.65 | Maldives |
| 2010s | 65.29 | 70.59 | 5.29 | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Lesotho, Kingdom of or Maldives?
- Lesotho, Kingdom of, at 70.59 against 70.59 in Maldives as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Lesotho, Kingdom of and Maldives?
- 0, with Lesotho, Kingdom of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho, Kingdom of and Maldives?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Lesotho, Kingdom of and Maldives rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Lesotho, Kingdom of ranks 76th and Maldives ranks 76th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.