Lithuania vs Norway: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score

Lithuania
82.35
in 2019
Norway
82.35
in 2019
Lithuania rank
27th
Norway rank
27th

Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time

  • Lithuania
  • Norway
020406080200320112019

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 82.35 against 82.35 in Norway, a difference of 0.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

Lithuania ranks 27th and Norway ranks 27th of 188 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Norway Difference Ahead
2000s 62.18 77.31 15.13 Norway
2010s 76.47 80 3.53 Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Lithuania or Norway?
Lithuania, at 82.35 against 82.35 in Norway as of 2019.
What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Lithuania and Norway?
0, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Norway?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Lithuania and Norway rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
Lithuania ranks 27th and Norway ranks 27th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.