Maldives vs United States: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Maldives
70.59
in 2019
United States
70.59
in 2019
Maldives rank
77th
United States rank
77th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Maldives
- United States
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 70.59 against 70.59 in United States, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Maldives ahead.
Maldives ranks 77th and United States ranks 77th of 191 countries.
Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.63 | 70.59 | 5.04 | Maldives |
| 2010s | 70.59 | 70.59 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Maldives or United States?
- Maldives, at 70.59 against 70.59 in United States as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Maldives and United States?
- 0, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and United States?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Maldives and United States rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Maldives ranks 77th and United States ranks 77th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.