Mali vs Poland, Republic of: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Mali
76.47
in 2019
Poland, Republic of
76.47
in 2019
Mali rank
51st
Poland, Republic of rank
51st
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Mali
- Poland, Republic of
How they compare
Mali currently reports 76.47 against 76.47 in Poland, Republic of, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Poland, Republic of ahead.
Mali ranks 51st and Poland, Republic of ranks 51st of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 1 and Poland, Republic of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Poland, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.7 | 44.54 | 0.8404 | Poland, Republic of |
| 2010s | 77.06 | 72.94 | 4.12 | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Mali or Poland, Republic of?
- Mali, at 76.47 against 76.47 in Poland, Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Mali and Poland, Republic of?
- 0, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Poland, Republic of?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Mali and Poland, Republic of rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Mali ranks 51st and Poland, Republic of ranks 51st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.