Marshall Islands vs Rwanda: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Marshall Islands
76.47
in 2019
Rwanda
76.47
in 2019
Marshall Islands rank
51st
Rwanda rank
51st
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Marshall Islands
- Rwanda
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 76.47 against 76.47 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Marshall Islands ranks 51st and Rwanda ranks 51st of 190 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74.79 | 56.3 | 18.49 | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 76.47 | 70 | 6.47 | Marshall Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Marshall Islands or Rwanda?
- Marshall Islands, at 76.47 against 76.47 in Rwanda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Marshall Islands and Rwanda?
- 0, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Rwanda?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Marshall Islands and Rwanda rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Marshall Islands ranks 51st and Rwanda ranks 51st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.