Mauritius vs Samoa: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score

Mauritius
82.35
in 2019
Samoa
82.35
in 2019
Mauritius rank
27th
Samoa rank
27th

Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time

  • Mauritius
  • Samoa
020406080200320112019

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 82.35 against 82.35 in Samoa, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 27th and Samoa ranks 27th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Samoa Difference Ahead
2000s 72.55 62.75 9.8 Mauritius
2010s 77.65 82.35 4.71 Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Mauritius or Samoa?
Mauritius, at 82.35 against 82.35 in Samoa as of 2019.
What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Mauritius and Samoa?
0, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Samoa?
16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
How do Mauritius and Samoa rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
Mauritius ranks 27th and Samoa ranks 27th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.