Micronesia (country) vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Micronesia (country)
64.71
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
64.71
in 2019
Micronesia (country) rank
99th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
99th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Micronesia (country)
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Micronesia (country) currently reports 64.71 against 64.71 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Micronesia (country) ranks 99th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 99th of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia (country) | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.71 | 64.71 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 64.71 | 64.71 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Micronesia (country) or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Micronesia (country), at 64.71 against 64.71 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Micronesia (country) and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Micronesia (country) and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 99th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 99th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.