Republic of Moldova vs Saudi Arabia: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Republic of Moldova
88.24
in 2019
Saudi Arabia
88.24
in 2019
Republic of Moldova rank
8th
Saudi Arabia rank
8th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 88.24 against 88.24 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.
Republic of Moldova ranks 8th and Saudi Arabia ranks 8th of 191 countries.
Republic of Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Moldova | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.7 | 14.29 | 29.41 | Republic of Moldova |
| 2010s | 71.76 | 38.82 | 32.94 | Republic of Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Republic of Moldova or Saudi Arabia?
- Republic of Moldova, at 88.24 against 88.24 in Saudi Arabia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Republic of Moldova and Saudi Arabia?
- 0, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Saudi Arabia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Saudi Arabia rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 8th and Saudi Arabia ranks 8th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.