Mongolia vs Palau: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score

Mongolia
58.82
in 2019
Palau
58.82
in 2019
Mongolia rank
128th
Palau rank
128th

Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time

  • Mongolia
  • Palau
0204060200320112019

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 58.82 against 58.82 in Palau, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Palau ahead.

Mongolia ranks 128th and Palau ranks 128th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Palau in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Palau Difference Ahead
2000s 57.98 60.5 2.52 Palau
2010s 60 58.82 1.18 Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Mongolia or Palau?
Mongolia, at 58.82 against 58.82 in Palau as of 2019.
What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Mongolia and Palau?
0, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Palau?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Mongolia and Palau rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
Mongolia ranks 128th and Palau ranks 128th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.