Mozambique vs Namibia: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score

Mozambique
47.06
in 2019
Namibia
47.06
in 2019
Mozambique rank
161st
Namibia rank
161st

Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time

  • Mozambique
  • Namibia
01020304050200320112019

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 47.06 against 47.06 in Namibia, a difference of 0.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Mozambique ranks 161st and Namibia ranks 161st of 188 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 28.57 47.06 18.49 Namibia
2010s 47.06 47.06 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Mozambique or Namibia?
Mozambique, at 47.06 against 47.06 in Namibia as of 2019.
What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Mozambique and Namibia?
0, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Namibia?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Mozambique and Namibia rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
Mozambique ranks 161st and Namibia ranks 161st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.