Netherlands vs United Kingdom: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Netherlands
82.35
in 2019
United Kingdom
82.35
in 2019
Netherlands rank
29th
United Kingdom rank
29th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Netherlands
- United Kingdom
How they compare
Netherlands currently reports 82.35 against 82.35 in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was United Kingdom ahead.
Netherlands ranks 29th and United Kingdom ranks 29th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Netherlands averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Netherlands | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.07 | 70.59 | 2.52 | United Kingdom |
| 2010s | 79.41 | 76.47 | 2.94 | Netherlands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Netherlands or United Kingdom?
- Netherlands, at 82.35 against 82.35 in United Kingdom as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Netherlands and United Kingdom?
- 0, with Netherlands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and United Kingdom?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Netherlands and United Kingdom rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Netherlands ranks 29th and United Kingdom ranks 29th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.