New Zealand vs Singapore: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
New Zealand
100
in 2019
Singapore
94.12
in 2019
New Zealand rank
1st
Singapore rank
3rd
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- New Zealand
- Singapore
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 100 against 94.12 in Singapore, a difference of 5.88.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Singapore's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 3rd of 191 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.8 | 73.95 | 21.85 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 100 | 89.41 | 10.59 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, New Zealand or Singapore?
- New Zealand, at 100 against 94.12 in Singapore as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between New Zealand and Singapore?
- 5.88, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Singapore?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and Singapore rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- New Zealand ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 3rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.