North Macedonia vs Timor-Leste: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
North Macedonia
70.59
in 2019
Timor-Leste
70.59
in 2019
North Macedonia rank
77th
Timor-Leste rank
77th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- North Macedonia
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 70.59 against 70.59 in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Timor-Leste ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 77th and Timor-Leste ranks 77th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 1 and Timor-Leste in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.29 | 41.18 | 5.88 | Timor-Leste |
| 2010s | 71.18 | 65.88 | 5.29 | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, North Macedonia or Timor-Leste?
- North Macedonia, at 70.59 against 70.59 in Timor-Leste as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between North Macedonia and Timor-Leste?
- 0, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Timor-Leste?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do North Macedonia and Timor-Leste rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- North Macedonia ranks 77th and Timor-Leste ranks 77th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.