Papua New Guinea vs Romania: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Papua New Guinea
70.59
in 2019
Romania
70.59
in 2019
Papua New Guinea rank
77th
Romania rank
77th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Romania
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 70.59 against 70.59 in Romania, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 77th and Romania ranks 77th of 191 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.59 | 69.75 | 0.8403 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 70.59 | 69.41 | 1.18 | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Papua New Guinea or Romania?
- Papua New Guinea, at 70.59 against 70.59 in Romania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Papua New Guinea and Romania?
- 0, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Romania?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Romania rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 77th and Romania ranks 77th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.