Papua New Guinea vs United States of America: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Papua New Guinea
70.59
in 2019
United States of America
70.59
in 2019
Papua New Guinea rank
77th
United States of America rank
77th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Papua New Guinea
- United States of America
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 70.59 against 70.59 in United States of America, a difference of 0.
Across all 17 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 77th and United States of America ranks 77th of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | United States of America | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.59 | 70.59 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 70.59 | 70.59 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Papua New Guinea or United States of America?
- Papua New Guinea, at 70.59 against 70.59 in United States of America as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Papua New Guinea and United States of America?
- 0, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and United States of America?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and United States of America rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 77th and United States of America ranks 77th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.