Poland vs Rwanda: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score

Poland
76.47
in 2019
Rwanda
76.47
in 2019
Poland rank
50th
Rwanda rank
50th

Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time

  • Poland
  • Rwanda
020406080200320112019

How they compare

Poland currently reports 76.47 against 76.47 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Rwanda ahead.

Poland ranks 50th and Rwanda ranks 50th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Poland averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland Rwanda Difference Ahead
2000s 44.54 56.3 11.76 Rwanda
2010s 72.94 70 2.94 Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Poland or Rwanda?
Poland, at 76.47 against 76.47 in Rwanda as of 2019.
What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Poland and Rwanda?
0, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Rwanda?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Poland and Rwanda rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
Poland ranks 50th and Rwanda ranks 50th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.