Russian Federation vs Senegal: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Russian Federation
82.35
in 2019
Senegal
82.35
in 2019
Russian Federation rank
29th
Senegal rank
29th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Russian Federation
- Senegal
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 82.35 against 82.35 in Senegal, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Senegal ahead.
Russian Federation ranks 29th and Senegal ranks 29th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Russian Federation averaged higher in 1 and Senegal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.78 | 51.26 | 2.52 | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 73.06 | 81.76 | 8.71 | Senegal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Russian Federation or Senegal?
- Russian Federation, at 82.35 against 82.35 in Senegal as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Russian Federation and Senegal?
- 0, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Senegal?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Russian Federation and Senegal rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Russian Federation ranks 29th and Senegal ranks 29th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.