Sao Tome and Principe vs Switzerland: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Sao Tome and Principe
70.59
in 2019
Switzerland
70.59
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe rank
77th
Switzerland rank
77th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- Switzerland
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 70.59 against 70.59 in Switzerland, a difference of 0.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Switzerland has been ahead every year.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 77th and Switzerland ranks 77th of 191 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sao Tome and Principe | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.18 | 70.59 | 29.41 | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 65.29 | 70.59 | 5.29 | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Sao Tome and Principe or Switzerland?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 70.59 against 70.59 in Switzerland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Sao Tome and Principe and Switzerland?
- 0, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Switzerland?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and Switzerland rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 77th and Switzerland ranks 77th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.