Sao Tome and Principe vs East Timor: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score (Men)
Sao Tome and Principe
70.59
in 2019
East Timor
70.59
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe rank
77th
East Timor rank
77th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score (Men) over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- East Timor
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 70.59 against 70.59 in East Timor, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was East Timor ahead.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 77th and East Timor ranks 77th of 191 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sao Tome and Principe | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.18 | 41.18 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 65.29 | 65.88 | 0.5882 | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Sao Tome and Principe or East Timor?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 70.59 against 70.59 in East Timor as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Sao Tome and Principe and East Timor?
- 0, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and East Timor?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and East Timor rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 77th and East Timor ranks 77th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.