Sierra Leone vs Uruguay: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Sierra Leone
76.47
in 2019
Uruguay
76.47
in 2019
Sierra Leone rank
51st
Uruguay rank
51st
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Sierra Leone
- Uruguay
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 76.47 against 76.47 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Sierra Leone ranks 51st and Uruguay ranks 51st of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Sierra Leone averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sierra Leone | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62.18 | 42.02 | 20.17 | Sierra Leone |
| 2010s | 72.94 | 72.94 | 0 | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Sierra Leone or Uruguay?
- Sierra Leone, at 76.47 against 76.47 in Uruguay as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Sierra Leone and Uruguay?
- 0, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Uruguay?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Sierra Leone and Uruguay rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Sierra Leone ranks 51st and Uruguay ranks 51st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.