Solomon Islands vs South Africa: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Solomon Islands
64.71
in 2019
South Africa
64.71
in 2019
Solomon Islands rank
99th
South Africa rank
99th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Solomon Islands
- South Africa
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 64.71 against 64.71 in South Africa, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Solomon Islands ranks 99th and South Africa ranks 99th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Solomon Islands averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Solomon Islands | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.71 | 58.82 | 5.88 | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 64.71 | 67.06 | 2.35 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Solomon Islands or South Africa?
- Solomon Islands, at 64.71 against 64.71 in South Africa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Solomon Islands and South Africa?
- 0, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and South Africa?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Solomon Islands and South Africa rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Solomon Islands ranks 99th and South Africa ranks 99th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.