South Africa vs Vanuatu: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
South Africa
64.71
in 2019
Vanuatu
64.71
in 2019
South Africa rank
99th
Vanuatu rank
99th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- South Africa
- Vanuatu
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 64.71 against 64.71 in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Vanuatu ahead.
South Africa ranks 99th and Vanuatu ranks 99th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 1 and Vanuatu in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.82 | 60.5 | 1.68 | Vanuatu |
| 2010s | 67.06 | 61.18 | 5.88 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, South Africa or Vanuatu?
- South Africa, at 64.71 against 64.71 in Vanuatu as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between South Africa and Vanuatu?
- 0, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Vanuatu?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do South Africa and Vanuatu rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- South Africa ranks 99th and Vanuatu ranks 99th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.