Spain vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Spain
64.71
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
64.71
in 2019
Spain rank
99th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
99th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Spain
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Spain currently reports 64.71 against 64.71 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Spain ranks 99th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 99th of 191 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Spain | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.06 | 64.71 | 17.65 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 56.47 | 64.71 | 8.24 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Spain or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Spain, at 64.71 against 64.71 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Spain and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Spain and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Spain ranks 99th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 99th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.