Sri Lanka vs Trinidad and Tobago: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Sri Lanka
64.71
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
64.71
in 2019
Sri Lanka rank
99th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
99th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Sri Lanka
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 64.71 against 64.71 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 99th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 99th of 191 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.94 | 52.94 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 58.24 | 62.94 | 4.71 | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Sri Lanka or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Sri Lanka, at 64.71 against 64.71 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Sri Lanka and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Sri Lanka and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Sri Lanka ranks 99th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 99th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.